Emarketer says "Do Not Fear Customer Reviews"

According to EMarketer, businesses need not fear the Web 2.0 reviews because "They're usually good." They say this based on a couple of studies which they listed in their article. This is quite an interesting take on things....

"Consumers generally had good intentions when writing reviews." They are trying to help out others to make decisions apparently. (Though I would suggest that there is a bit of "wanting to be heard" as well... kinda like writing a blog).




As you can see from the Baazarvoice survey, most people say they are either "positive most times" (51%) or "positive everytime" (36%).

I am still skeptical of this though as I have, more often than not, come across "negative most times" or "equally split". Perhaps this is because the hospitality industry is different from other online retailers. We are not just selling products or services, we are selling experiences. And expectations of those experiences vary from person to person.

When we meet those expectations, the customer is "satisfied" and does not blog or write about his satisfactory stay at so and so hotel. Especially if he/she stays at hotels 30 or more nights a year.

When we do not meet those expectations, they are unhappy and will bluster and complain and can now do so on tripadvisor or whereever.

When we exceed those expectations, they walk away happy and may tell their friend, family and colleagues about it. And may even put it into some Web 2.0 site.

However, it seems that people are to be more driven to write about the bad experiences in hotels than the good.

But rather than "fear" them, we hoteliers should embrace them and take them as feedback. We need to put a role within our hotels to deal with this just as any other complaints that we get from a guest standing in front of us.

Millennium Hotel’s eCommerce Strategic Action Plan for 2007

It's 29th November 2007, and I am on my holiday in beautiful Phuket, Thailand. This is a very nice downtime and gives me a bit of time to reflect on the past year thus far. I looked back at the Strategic Action Plan for Millennium Hotels’ eCommerce that I put together last December-January, which is as follows:

There were 4 main areas that I wanted to focus on this year based on where we were as we entered into 2007: Search Engine Marketing, Reporting & Analytics, Website Re-engineering & Development and Email Marketing.

1) Search Engine Marketing:

PPC Goals & Plans –
- Increase average worldwide Return-on-adspend to 15-to-1
- Increase generic, non-branded keyword spread
- Engage SEM Specialist to manage my PPC campaign

SEO Goals & Plans –
- Review existing search engine optimization that was being carried out by Profero under the existing contract
- Plan for SEO for the new website due out later in the year
- Plan and implement other strategic SEO projects outside of the current site
- Change SEO agencies or augment the work by existing agency with other agencies


2) Reporting & Analytics

M & C implemented Omniture into our websites in early 2006 before I joined. We were getting basic web analytics like pageviews, visits, and referrer domains as well as revenue and conversion. However, the eCommerce data did not tie up directly with our Synxis data, which was supposed to be the source of the eCommerce data. Anyhow, the plan for 2007 was to clean up the analytics and set up the following reports:

- Top Level Reporting for global and corporate users like myself. The data set is more general and aggregated up so that users get the “bigger picture” to make business decisions at that level.

- Regional Level Reporting for our regions: EMEA, US, Asia, and New Zealand. The data set would aggregated up to each regions’ level so that they can view how the region is doing, but also allow them to see top level reports for each hotel to see how they perform. These reports have not yet been developed so we may need a lot of work to implement the taggings needs. The plan is to develop the initial reports by mid 2007 and take it from there.

- Hotel Level Reporting for each of the hotels so that they can see how they perform online and how their individual websites perform as well. Again, these reports were not yet set up so the tagging needed to be looked at and the first reports to be set up. The individual reports will then needed to be set up by the regions themselves.


3) Email Marketing

Our email marketing was very disparate and is managed independently by the regions and also by the hotels themselves. To cut cost, get brand consistency, instill best practices and seriously manage our CRM, we should get everyone on the same platform. Since everyone owned their own list and wanted to protect it, it does not seem practical to ask them to just simply migrate over. The plan is to develop a best practices platform for one region and then show the other regions and the hotels the benefits of the platform – one which would still allow them to control their lists.


4) Website Re-Engineering & Development

The existing website was put together in late 2005 on a limited budget and was using Lotus Domino as a webserver. It has a content management system, but this was custom built and not very flexible or user-friendly. There was already a plan to upgrade the website to IBM WebSphere running on DB2. So we needed to relook at the whole implementation from tagging to site structure to search engine friendliness and even to a new content management system that could be scalable to future development plans.

So the plan was to redevelop the new site under a new system. At the same time, update the design and build country focused sites for our major markets - .com for the US, .co.uk for the United Kingdom, .com.sg for Singapore and co.nz for New Zealand. Future plans included meetings sites for the hotels with major conferencing facilities, destination guides for each hotel, and niche sites like weddings to target those markets as well as non-English versions of hotel sites to target source markets of each hotel.

This undertaking would be the largest and most ambitious activity of the 4 listed here encompassing Search Engine Optimization and Reporting & Analytics as well as Design, Development, and Technical Systems.


*****************

Here is a quick summary and rationality of the above 4 areas of focus:



...... Well, that’s it for now. Back to my holiday. (close the laptop and refocus my eyes on the palm trees, beach and sailboats!)

“Sawasdee Kap” from Joe @ By The Sea Residences, Cape Panwa, Phuket, Thailand.

Expedia's new hybrid OTA model

Last week, Expedia announce an agreement with InterContinental Hotels Group "under which consumers can now book IHG hotels on Expedia® sites globally." As we all know, IHG stopped distributing via Expedia about 3 years ago when Hotels.com was yield managing cities and killing rate parity. Hotels were checking hotels.com to set their "rate of the day".

But now the largest OTA and the largest hotel group have kissed and made up. And they have given birth to a new hybrid. From Expedia's press release:

"IHG is participating as the launch partner for Expedia, Inc.'s new media-based pricing model. The dynamic, two-part economic model will blend transaction pricing with media pricing based on clicks on specific IHG properties in Expedia.com and hotels.com search results. Expedia and IHG collaboratively developed this innovative approach to distribution marketing -- a first in online travel -- where IHG will receive significant benefits from value-added media placement throughout the Expedia network in addition to the bookings they receive from Expedia."

This is about as clear as mud. I am not clear what this means from an implementation perspective. It sound a lot like the restatement of Expedia's "Marketing budget recontribution" in which 2% or so of the commission from the hotel is put back into a Marketing kitty so that you can use it to boost your presence in Expedia's own site. This is of course going to direct people to booking your hotel on Expedia still and hence contribute back to Expedia.
Markus Busch from Hotelmarketing.com offers an explanation:

"The media pricing element is part of a dynamic, two-part economic model that blends transaction pricing with media pricing based on clicks on specific IHG properties in Expedia and Hotels.com search results.

When a customer clicks on a hotel in the Expedia or Hotels.com search results, they are taken to that individual hotel’s customized info-site that contains not only rates and availability and the ability to make a reservation, but also rich and deep content, such as traveler opinions, virtual tours and photos of the property.

IHG hotels will be shown just like all the other hotels on Exepdia, but the agreement differs from other partnerships in that the compensation structure accounts not only for the bookings IHG receives through Expedia, but also for the clicks on IHG properties in the hotel search results on Expedia and Hotels.com sites."

Hmm.... it still sounds like a different cut of the marketing contribution kick back. Expedia is incentivized to promote IHG properties and will collect commission. I do not think that is much of a significant change for most of us at this point, but yes, it is a hybrid model and it remains to be seen whether Expedia is a good as Google in list IHG in relevant searches (not!)

What is significant and unsaid, however, are the commercial terms of this deal. Expedia has been courting IHG for years, and IHG's hotels have been pushing Eric Pearson's department to do a deal as well. IHG would not accept any commissions unless it was around 10-15% (or less!), whereas a typical Expedia commission ranges from (18-25%). Expedia then tries to make up the revenue difference by getting on the PPC bandwagon; and in exchange IHG gets increased brand exposure on Expedia networks.

Hopefully, this opens the doors for the rest of us hotel groups to DECREASE our commissionable rates with Expedia. HOORAY!!!!!

Newsweek: Facebook unveils ad targeting program

So Facebook finally grows up... and gets a proper business model. Then again.. is it a good business model?

It is ridiculous that both Microsoft and NY hedge firms are valuing Facebook at USD 15 Billion. (yes that is a big "B" and not "M".). I mean I did not blog when I read that, but certainly thought to myself "uh... why? What's the business models?" Up to recently, they were selling banner ads that do not work as well as icons ... I mean "Gifts"... to the same people who buy ringtones online. But that is not worth USD 15 BILLION!

So now they have unveiled an ad targeting program.

According to the Facebook Press Release, "Facebook Ads, an ad system for businesses to connect with users and target advertising to the exact audiences they want." You know what? It sounds like Google Adsense: " With Google's extensive AdWords advertiser base, we have ads for just about all categories of businesses and for practically all types of content, no matter how specialized. Google technology matches the most relevant and highest performing AdWords ads to your website."

I was getting excited when Newsweek started: "Facebook is giving users some control over whether to share information on their buying habits and other online activities with friends."

But the reality according to the press fodder was: "Facebook Ads launched with three parts: a way for businesses to build pages on Facebook to connect with their audiences; an ad system that facilitates the spread of brand messages virally through Facebook Social Ads™; and an interface to gather insights into people’s activity on Facebook that marketers care about."

Viral marketing is great but is it worth USD 15 BILLION SMACKAROOS?

During the a Google Panel, I actually suggested to Google why don't they let the AdSense site owners decide exactly what ad or product they advertise? This would apply to all social network sites they have and any Adsense customers. So let the market decides what it want to advertise on its pages and split the commission. Not just the product, but even choose the "etailer".

What if Facebook did this: produced a "What's in my purse?" widget/gadget/fadget and let people load up their "purse" with actual branded items. The brand marketers pay for this advertising AND facebook splits the ad dollar with the person. Extend this to "My mobile", "my watch", "my shampoo", "my computers", "my underwear", and even "my wallet" (including what type of Trojans and what flavor.). Imagine the freaking market research!!!

Now that is a business model. Not some silly "ad system that facilitates the spread of brand messages virally". This model is not viral. It is mainstream marketing and branding. And that's where the money is. It is not in viral marketing which is for product launches and market studies.

Besides transactional sites, all other web publishers are like any other media (print, TV, radio): Their main revenue comes from advertising. So get a proper business model to make the most out of that. Google currently gets the lion's share of my online marketing spend, because they perform and because I can track exactly how much money I make from the ads. And until Yahoo, Facebook, Myspace, etc get their collective acts together, they are still going to get left overs... if anything at all.

Peace. Out.

10 Mega-Trends from Google

Google held a "Google Singapore Marketing Brief" a couple of days ago (13th Nov) at my M Hotel (plug and disclosure). The agenda was:

14:30 - 15:15 Southeast Asia Internet Snapshot
by an APAC Senior Analyst from Hitwise.

15:15 - 16:00 A New Approach to Media
By Google's Vice President, Asia Pacific & Latin America

16:00 - 17:30 Panel Discussion with:
- Sukhinder Singh-Cassidy, Google's Presenter above.
- Jeffrey Seah, CEO Mindshare & Maxus Singapore
- Miguel Bernas, Multimedia Marketing Manager, Asia Pacific, Nokia.
- And yours truly, Director - Global eCommerce, Millennium & Copthorne Hotels

The Hitwise presentation had some good data, but the delivery was a bit uninspiring... Perhaps it had something to do with the fact that I had just finished a buffet lunch and my blood is working around my belly rather than my head.

Sukhinder's presentation was around "10 Mega-Trends". I will list them here, but most of the examples she used were Google pitches. Fair enough.

1) User Revolution - This is about "consumer generated media", "user generated content", "user driven content", etc. etc. etc. This is a no-brainer trend, but it certainly is MEGA. Note that we do not say "Web 2.0" anymore. That is so passe' or "Expired" per Wired Mag's categorization of "Wired, Tired, or Expired".

2) Consumers are "Always on". So what else is new? They are, or will be, on via PDAs, cellphones, Blackberries, watches, and iPhones (its not a PDA or cell; its in a class of its own.); at home, at work, in the car, on the bus, at the kids' baseball game, while watching TV... and studies have shown that people are airtyping in their sleep. (just kidding).

3) Offline drives online. Straight-forward, but I would say it is a symbiotic relationship that will one day become a single indivisible organism. With augmented-reality displays and googles, you will one day feel naked without it. From a hotel perspective, this industry is going to save so much money on renovation: all we got to do is renovate our augmented universe to a 7-star hotel and the guests won't know that they are sitting on a 20-year old sofa.

4) Local search is growing. May be this is not so apparent to most of the people in the audience, but they better pay attention. Our best PPC "campaign" segment is Google Maps UK where we get return-on-ad-spend (ROAS) between $27 and $30 for every dollar spent. Users are not just looking for "New York hotels" anymore; they are searching for "broadway hotels", "hotels near times square NY", and "bangkok hotels near soi cowboy" (inside joke and SEO inbound link for my new hotel).

5) Video is big - and getting bigger. Youtube, Joost, Veoh. Startup like TVtrip. While Sukhinder meant "getting bigger" as in more popular, I think that "getting bigger" also literally applies to size - full screen and HD in all its glory.

6) Brand connections occur across the web. Consumer are not coming across your brand only on your website. They see it on retailer sites, on social networks, on portals, on search engines... So how do you keep track of that and manage the brand or the reputation?

7) Niche sites have tremendous value. There was a chart that showed that 80% of the ad revenue is going to the Big Four sites (Google, Yahoo, MSN, and whatever), but these sites only get less than 50% of the traffic. There is much potential for reaching a targeted audience by searching out these niche secondary/tertiary sites.

8) Mass personalization. Another a no-brainer. Sukhinder used iGoogle as an example. It's a great example of a personalized DIY portal with your own widgets, gadgets, and feeds. This is from a user's perspective, but from a business perspective, I think the prime example is amazon.com. "You recently searched for....", "People who selected this also bought...". This is pushed personalization based on your behavior. Scary huh? (ooooo.. "pushed personalization" has a nice ring to it. Just Googled it. This phrase has not been used before in this way. I coined it first - right here, OK? So when Tim O'Reilly starts using at his next conference, you know he has read this blog.")

9) Creativity on massive scale. Sounds like crowdsourcing to me. She used the example of Threadless T-Shirt. I blogged about Embassy Suites in September. Sounds great to me: Cheap labor, cheap market research, and cheap customers. WARNING: design is very subjective, especially in a multi-cultural global market. You might want to segment those massive crowdsourcing creatives by region or countries or even cities. Shall we call it "creativity on a massive personalization scale"?

10) Digital is at the center of the world. With 1 billion people online (actually 791 million according to Comscore's September 07 figures), this is becoming the nexus of business, social, and familiar interactions. And the trend will only go up. Another 4 billion to go. But hey do those 4 Billion really count? I mean - we already got most of the G8 wired. G20 is moving along fine. Do we really need to worry about the G21 to G194? Just get China and India up to 50% each and we are already in the 2billion mark.

As I was listening to Sukhinder, I can't help but think, "Where is Analytics as a trend?". I wrote about the Competing on Analytics book and I am totally certain that this is where the world will be heading. I mentioned this when I was on the panel, but now that I have been giving it more thought, I have a different conclusion:

Analytics is a meta-megatrend. (Hahahahaahah....... Googled it.. another term coined by me. Take that all you highly-paid, suited Accenture/IBM/E&Y/McKinsey/BearPoint/CapGem management consultants. Better yet, pay me royalty for the usage.)

Seriously, analytics is a trend of trends. The whole online marketplace, from the perspective of businesses, will be driven by information. None of the above trends will matter unless every single detail can be tracked, categorized, filtered, consolidated and push on some digital dashboards somewhere so that someone can make business decisions. The above trends exists because there is the business world that can support it, or at least some of these start-ups think that they have the right ... what do you call it.... BUSINESS model. And business in the the future is driven by analytics. Capishe?

Book Recommendation: The Afghan (fiction)

So I was off for a long weekend because of Deepavali public holiday. The family and I went to Malaysia (Johor State) for some golf, horse-riding and general R&R. I picked up this book, The Afghan (By Frederick Forsyth) coming back from the UK the week before. I figured I have been reading enough non-fiction that I needed to let my mind have a bit of exercise. The bookshop girl recommended this, so why not?



It was actually a good quick read. Like many books these days, there is a mix of reality and fiction so you feel like you are actually learning a lot while reading. In this case, it is about the terrorist network and how it came about and some historical info as well. I always like these kinds of stories. Just try to keep the the fact from fiction.

Overall, great read, if you are in for a good espionage/action/modern setting storytelling.

Analytics: The End of Intuition?

I read an article above from Newsweek's September issue called "Era of the Super Cruncher". Very interesting read so it is worth a read (after reading this post of course). This is based on the book "Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart" by Ian Ayres. It sounds like the "Competing on Analytics" booked I reviewed here.

Newsweek:- "... a powerful trend that will shape the economy for years to come: the replacement of expertise and intuition by objective, data-based decision making, made possible by a virtually inexhaustible supply of inexpensive information."

So we go from Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink" (Jan 2005) to intuition & expertise is being replaced in 2.5 years. I have not read Super Cruncher but I would support the view that they need to both co-exist. Expertise and experience is always necessary, but having the latest and relevant information is definitely better than not having it. And even the more informed novice still would not know which is the best solution in the medium to long term, after all information is about what HAS happened and not what WILL happen.

NW:- "Those who control and manipulate this data will be the masters of the new economic universe."



He-Man and She-Ra - that's what those of us uber-geeks will become.


NW:- "Super-crunchable data can be broadly statistical or profoundly personal. Illustrating the former, Ayres chose the title of his book by running two Google ads that appeared in random order when someone searched for phrases like 'data mining.' The decision was made by the plurality who clicked on the ad for 'Super Crunchers' rather than the competing title, 'The End of Intuition.' "

KEWL!! Though I prefer "The End of Intuition"

NW:- "Increasingly, jobs that used to call for independent judgment, especially about other people, are being routinized and dumbed down. Banks no longer care about a loan officer's assessment of whether a borrower is a good risk; everything they need to know is in the numbers."

Right.. so those loan officers' assessments were good to begin with? If they were good, then they wouldn't have been replaced right? But then, some one.. some person has to come up with the algorithms and program these computers right?

He has a point though in this case though. I am getting pre-approved offers for unsecured loans and credit cards - which must have been initiated after an automated credit check. There is no need for a loan officer now.

I am still not convinced that this is the death of intuition, but then I guess I should read the book... Will check back later after I read this.